Search Details

Word: testing (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...liberal views were discussed?" But a question like this one is difficult to smile at for long, when you consider that it was asked by representatives of the U.S. government (which apparently has found that "liberal views" work well at the polls) of a ship-yard worker as a test of his loyalty to the nation. Rogge's book is filled with such examples of indiscriminate and ignorant persecution of the minds and earning capacities of American men and women...

Author: By John G. Simon, | Title: The Bookshelf | 5/4/1949 | See Source »

Like every other chemistry department, Harvard's test-tube scientists spend a lot of time trying to stamp out cancer...

Author: By John J. Sack, | Title: University's Chemists Try Mustard Gas to Wipe Out Cancer Growths | 5/4/1949 | See Source »

...ending of this condition. Our primary interest is in the development of a systematic and rigorous body of social theory capable of predicting behavior. To state that we are getting more empirical is only to state that we are interested in the operation and materials by which we can test our theories...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Social Relations 'Correction' | 5/3/1949 | See Source »

...test now looks simple, but Dr. Richardson, 52, has been working for five years to develop it. It is based on the long-known fact that the amount of the female hormone, estrone, in the urine increases greatly after conception. First, Dr. Richardson puts a specimen of urine in a special double-barreled test tube he invented. Then he gets rid of other hormones (progesterone derivatives), which might interfere with the test, by mixing in chloroform and sodium hydroxide. The fluid containing estrone rises to the top. This fluid is put in two other test tubes and a different chemical...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Medicine: No Frogs, No Rabbits | 5/2/1949 | See Source »

...Richardson has tried his test 1,000 times. At first, before he perfected the technique, there were a few "false positive" errors. In a later series of 467 tests (235 pregnant, 232 not), there were no errors. Any competent pathologist, he says, can make the test as soon as he has the two reagents handy. Dr. Richardson will not tell what they are until he publishes his report in a medical magazine. His reason: he does not want some one pharmaceutical house stealing a march and rushing out with a kit to get rich quick on his quick test...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Medicine: No Frogs, No Rabbits | 5/2/1949 | See Source »

First | Previous | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | Next | Last