Word: referendums
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...questions related to the U.C.'s recently enacted increase of their fee on the term-bill. Gabay, in an action that the Council's executive board will debate, rejected four of the questions because of the wording of the U.C.'s Constitution: "Any question may be committed to a referendum...by a petition signed by one-tenth of the undergraduates...
...argument offered in return by Gabay was that putting in five questions would be "packing" the referendum-as though students at Harvard were not biologically advanced enough to deal with five separate issues at once! Gabay went even further, saying that the Council was "being nice enough" by allowing the main question of the term-bill increase to go to a vote. So Davis was never assured of a vote until Gabay and Liston decided to be nice? The U.C. Constitution would have something to say about that, and so should Dean Epps...
...forget about the attitudes of Council executives for a moment--the U.C. Constitution itself could use an overhaul. A continuation of the section on referenda reads, "Such a referendum will be advisory unless the provisions of the referendum make its results binding. Such an order can be overturned by three-fourths of the Council." Students should find this language intolerable...
First of all, any referendum whose results are imposed upon the Council by a majority of the population should be binding. Have you ever heard of Jeffersonian democracy? It's the kind where the majority rules. Have you ever heard of democracy? It's that funny political system where the population has the final say. By threatening to ignore students' mandates, the Council has cut out its own little oligarchy in the middle of Cambridge. The day on which the Council overturns a decision made by its constituents is the day the Council should be dissolved...
Only one exception can be made to the logic listed above. If students are so poorly informed about the Council's activities that the result of a referendum is truly contrary to their own interests, an overturning could be in order. However, such a scenario could only occur when the Undergraduate Council has shirked its responsibility to tell its constituents about its activities. This year, the Council began publication of the Courier, its newsletter. Unfortunately, distribution has been sporadic and unreliable. In any case, 66 of 88 Council members should not be able to veto the opinions...