Search Details

Word: limitates (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...course enrollments several months early. But students worry that the requirement to obtain the signature of the instructor of every course they wish to add or drop during “shopping week”—preregistration’s promised liberal add/drop period—would limit their freedom to branch out and try unconventional classes...

Author: By Laura L. Krug, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Faculty To Debate Preregistration | 3/11/2003 | See Source »

Additionally, administrators say early course estimates should allow professors to find adequate meeting space to accommodate all interested students, which should limit the number of courses that must be lotteried each year. Gross notes, however, that only four to five courses are lotteried each semester...

Author: By Laura L. Krug, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Faculty To Debate Preregistration | 3/11/2003 | See Source »

...platform” before carefully examining the issues in committee. But even more fundamentally, these committees are deliberative bodies, and not places where representatives are sent to “accomplish” a predetermined “agenda.” Such thinking will limit the students’ ability to keep the same open minds we have repeatedly urged faculty and administrators to display. Elections would further make it difficult to ensure that a diversity of views are represented in these working groups...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Reviewing Student Choice | 3/6/2003 | See Source »

...students focused their attack on how the current proposal—which requires students to get the signatures of their advisors and the professors for each class they want to switch—will limit student choice and push them into “safer,” more mainstream classes...

Author: By Jessica E. Vascellaro, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Student Presents Petition To Save Shopping Period | 3/6/2003 | See Source »

...these apologies miss the point. When compared to the strenuous objections leveled by the scientific community against a previous attempt to limit research on national security grounds, it becomes clear that the purpose of this statement was political, pure and simple. In October, the National Academies rebuked the Bush administration for trying to restrict the publication of “sensitive” science for security reasons. Now, scientists are urging the same sorts of restrictions they rejected so strongly five months ago. Instead of arguing on principle that knowledge is morally neutral, the Journal Editors and Authors Group accepted...

Author: By Jonathan H. Esensten, | Title: Anthrax? Censor It, Quick | 3/3/2003 | See Source »

First | Previous | 405 | 406 | 407 | 408 | 409 | 410 | 411 | 412 | 413 | 414 | 415 | 416 | 417 | 418 | 419 | 420 | 421 | 422 | 423 | 424 | 425 | Next | Last