Word: lampoonable
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...last number of the Lampoon is by far the best number of the present volume...
...purpose of talking over the most feasible plans for serving the best interests of each paper, and of elevating the position which journalism holds in the college community. The president of the evening was Mr. G. P. Warder, of the Advocate; toastmaster, Mr. J. P. Denison, of the Lampoon; orator, Mr. F. C. Cobb, of the CRIMSON; poet, Mr. H. T. Parker, of the Monthly, and chorister, Mr. R. E. Faulkner of the CRIMSON. The oration set forth the position now occupied by each of the college papers, and defined the province which each paper should make...
Twenty men, representing the CRIMSON, Advocate, Lampoon and the Monthly, met last evening to make arrangements for a dinner of the editors of the four college papers. Mr. Cobb, president of the CRIMSON presided and opened the meeting by stating the reasons for the dinner, and asked the opinion of the men present, as to the advisability of the holding the dinner By a unaimous vote it was decided to bold the dinner, and the business of elections was then taken up. A committee, consisting of the presidents of the four college papers, Messrs. Wardner, Dennison, Dodge and Cobb...
...Wardner, president of the Advocate, was unanimously elected president, and Mr. Dennison, president of the Lampoon, toastmaster. For poet there were two nominations, Mr. Parker, of the Monthly, and Mr. Gould, of the Lampoon; the former was elected. Mr. Cobb, president of the CRIMSON, was elected orator, and of the two nominees for chorister, Mr. Falukner, of the CRIMSON, and Mr. Atkinson, of the Lampoon, Mr. Faulkner was elected. It was suggested to the committee that the dinner should be held the last of next week or the first of the week following. As there was no more business...
...proposed scheme of a union dinner of the editors of the Advocate, Lampoon, Monthly and CRIMSON is an important and significant innovation. These four publications fill very different places and satisfy very different demands but, after all, their aim is the same. Forming. as they do, the strongest incentive to literary work, they are coming to see that their power in the future must depend largely upon their unity. The apparent rivalry between them has always been more fancied than real. That phase of college journalism by which one paper makes capital by carping at another is past. At Harvard...