Word: hirsch
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...fencing squad, which now consists of ninety men, has been divided, according to classes, into five sub-squads, under the following captains: Law School, H. J. Elam; 1903, H. St. Gaudens; 1904, F. P. Woodbury; 1905, W. McLeod and H. A. Hirsch; 1906, R. Merrill and Nichols. The men will meet in these squads until November 24, when the most promising candidates for the class teams will be given appointments with M. Pianelli. Other men may enter the novice classes held Wednesday and Friday of each week. The class teams, of three men and two substitutes, will be chosen December...
...Hirsch...
...following members of last year's baseball team are candidates again this year: F. C. Robertson '01 and J. S. Garvan '02, pitchers; A. M. Hirsch '01, catcher; A. H. Sharpe '02M; first-baseman; R. G. Guernsey '02, third-baseman; C. P. Cook '01S., and A. Barnwell, Jr., '02S., outfielders. Cook will be a candidate for pitcher this year. L. D. Waddell '01S., who played first base on the '99 team, is now trying for the position of catcher...
...John D. Long medals to these men: R. C. Bruce '02, M. Seasongood 1L., and H. P. Chandler '01. The following men received Surbridge cnps: R. C. Bruce '02, M. Seasongood 1L., H. P. Chandler '01, W. Catchings '01, P. E. Fitzpatrick '02, W. T. Foster '01, D. C. Hirsch '01, T. H. Reed '01, G. W. Hinkley '03, J. H. Rich '03, A. J. Hammerslough '03, J. W. Scott '04, A. A. Ballantine '04, N. A. Higgins '04, P. A. Atherton 1L., R. W. Sprague '97 and S. R. Wrightington...
...question was "Resolved, That the United States should use every means to maintain the integrity of the Chinese Empire." Harvard supported the negative and won chiefly by the unusual tactics of forcing her opponents to accept her interpretation of the question. The Harvard speakers, W. T. Foster, D. C. Hirsch, and W. Catchings excelled in analysis of the question and in rebuttal. The Boston University speakers, R. H. Newcomb, I. M. Huggan, and W. H. Dow, Jr., failed to present a consistant case, while their rebuttal was ragged and their form crude. There was far more assertion than proof...