Search Details

Word: headers (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Sunday in its last of three games at Jack Russell Stadium in Clearwater, Fla. The squad received stellar performances from two freshmen pitchers, Eric Eadington and Max Perlman, who only allowed a combined five hits on the day. In its second game of a double header Saturday, the Crimson lost to the Dukes (3-7) by a score of 6-4, as defensive woes plagued both teams. Harvard committed five errors and gave up four unearned runs. The Crimson won its season opener on Saturday, edging the Bobcats (2-2) 4-3 in extra innings. TAMPA 11, HARVARD...

Author: By Loren Amor, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Harvard Splits Behind Streaky Pitching | 3/12/2007 | See Source »

...that he received e-mail that he claimed he did not ask for. Contrary to the content of the article, the evidence in the case shows that 1) the e-mail sent to Mumma came from a working e-mail address, 2) all of the transmission information in the header was accurate (and enabled Mumma to find Omega without any difficulty), 3) Omega received a request to send e-mail to Mumma's address and 4) Omega's general counsel, John Lawless, did not promise Mumma that he would not receive any more e-mail because Mumma refused to provide...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Feb. 5, 2007 | 1/25/2007 | See Source »

Mumma's problems began two years ago with a simple e-mail message: How about a relaxing cruise? Labeled an "E-deal," it came from a nonworking address and included bogus information in its header, the section that says where an e-mail has been. Mumma got the message, the e-deal falsely claimed, because he had asked...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Spammer's Revenge | 1/5/2007 | See Source »

...word "materially" that tripped up Mumma. The appeals court ruled that bogus return addresses and header information didn't make e-deals "materially" misleading; after all, Mumma was able to track down the messages' source. The court's decision further weakens privacy in favor of free speech--at least for spammers. For their critics, the message is harsher: keep your mouth shut, or you could get sued...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Spammer's Revenge | 1/5/2007 | See Source »

...fact that he received email that he claimed he did not ask for. Contrary to the content of the article, the evidence in the case shows that: 1) the email sent to Mr. Mumma came from a working email address; 2) all of the transmission information in the header was accurate (and enabled Mr. Mumma to find Omega without any difficulty); 3) Omega received a request to send email to Mr. Mumma's address; and 4) John Lawless did not promise Mr. Mumma that he would not receive any more email because Mr. Mumma refused to provide his email address...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Spammer's Revenge | 1/5/2007 | See Source »

First | Previous | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Next | Last