Word: drexels
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...assets: $2.2 billion). State regulators were happy someone was willing to take over the sick thrift. Paul renamed the S&L and within a few years sent its profits zooming. His method: investing CenTrust's assets heavily in junk bonds, many of which he bought from Michael Milken at Drexel Burnham Lambert. By the late 1980s the payoff from CenTrust's $1.35 billion portfolio of junk made the S&L the region's most profitable thrift. But as the market value of junk bonds collapsed in recent months, CenTrust was doomed to go with...
...reaction to the last-minute payouts was swift and brutal, especially among Drexel creditors. One large unsecured creditor, First City Bancorp. of Texas, quickly filed a motion in federal bankruptcy court in New York City asking for an investigation. The New York Times lambasted the bonuses as a case of greed worthy of the Guinness Book of World Records and called on Drexel executives to return the dough. In Washington committees in both the House and the Senate are planning hearings this week that will explore the issue. "It may be that the payments themselves rendered Drexel insolvent," says attorney...
...Drexel officials are shocked by the backlash, which a spokesman calls "much ado about nothing." The firm contends that many of the bonuses were promised to executives early in 1989 and that Drexel's best and brightest might have quit en masse if such rewards had not been dangled before them. Nevertheless, Drexel violated one of the cardinal rules of compensation: that bonuses should be linked to corporate performance...
...Drexel is trying to reassure creditors that the bonuses were not doled out because of any sense of impending doom. "Believe me, nobody was shoveling money out the door because they felt the roof was caving in," says Drexel director Roderick Hills, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. "In fact, many executives expressed their confidence by taking their entire bonus in the form of equity." Among them: chief executive Frederick Joseph, who in December elected to take his $2 million-plus bonus in Drexel stock, which now is virtually worthless...
Even so, some Drexel insiders privately concede that the bonus payouts were excessive. "I certainly wouldn't have paid them," says a current Drexel director. "The bonuses were certainly consistent with the firm's culture and tradition, but if you're asking me an ethical question or a common-sense economic question, the answer is no. But that's the nature of the beast. It's a carry-over of the greed of the 1980s...