Word: documentation
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1970
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...Counsellor to the President could not resist the fetching phrase "benign neglect" to describe his notion of the proper attitude the Government should now have toward race relations. Predictably enough, the document caused a sensation. Last week two more of his papers trickled out of the federal bureaucracy. Both were dated just before Richard Nixon was inaugurated as President, but they nevertheless drew fire from both conservatives and liberals and kept Moynihan a foremost topic of national controversy (TIME, March...
...works. In 1963. Sabartés donated the rich collection to the city of Barcelona, which provided a lovely old palacio to house it. Picasso's bequest was actually made a month ago, when he summoned a Barcelona notary public to his Riviera villa and dictated a document, declaring, "I, Pablo Picasso, in memory of my unforgettable friend Jaime Sabartés, grant the bequest to the city of Barcelona...
LIKE Report. Warrendale was rejected by its sponsors: the official censure of Report found it too abstract and formalistic, while Warrendale was too earthy for Canadian television (and Titicut Follies too sensational for Massachusetts). With Wiseman's films Warrendale attempts to document the nature of institutional life using synchronized sound-recording and close shooting to situate us in the midst of events. Located somewhere near Toronto, Warrendale is a home for emotionally disturbed children; the film is what its maker, Allan King, calls a "persona record" of staff and patient life there...
...three other White House assistants, four Cabinet members, and no fewer than 25 copies circulated around HEW, where, Moynihan suspects, the leak occurred. Reaction from liberals was swift. Twenty-one civil rights leaders made a highly emotional public reply, complaining that the memo was a "flagrant and shameful political document." It all depended on how the memo was read: it was, after all, written in the context of White House infighting; it could easily be interpreted as a slightly veiled attack on the conservatives in the Administration, especially John Mitchell: "At the risk of indiscretion, may I put it that...
...modest Senator, and an attorney," but not a medical expert. Now Attorney Javits reached for the evidence and read aloud that it had been published by Mead, Johnson back in 1965, and Nelson had failed to mention that it is no longer being distributed. The so-called "official Government document," he found, was in fact a private publication recording the views expressed by many investigators at a seminar financed by the U.S. Public Health Service...