Search Details

Word: documentation (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Although the use of military power under Article 16 did not purport to be compulsory, no compulsion of written words in a document could have forced the member nations, against their will, to call out their armies and navies to stop aggression. And no compulsion of written words in a document could have forced the member nations, against their will, to call out a League army and navy if a League army and navy had existed...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: FREEDOM FROM ATTACK: International Police | 9/13/1943 | See Source »

...United Press fell for the story that the U.S. Government was in possession of information concerning a "secret document": an alleged, Fascist-sounding oath by which De Gaullists swear eternal allegiance to their chief. The enlistment oath, printed in London last April, contained no such clause...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE PRESIDENCY: There is No France | 7/19/1943 | See Source »

...record was a curiously uneven document. It came into being as the people's answer to the wretched 77th, which had botched and boggled its way into history, cursed from coast to coast for its pensions-for-Congressmen, its personal X-cards for gas, its lack of statesmanship...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE CONGRESS: We Have to Answer . . . | 7/19/1943 | See Source »

...writer of Moscow communiques last week snatched bread & words from the mouths of a host of military experts. In a single, barking document this anonymous Muscovite stated the objective and strategy of the latest German offensive in Russia...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: BATTLE OF RUSSIA: If This Is All... | 7/19/1943 | See Source »

...document the latter charge, Mr. Ickes pointed out that the House (Kerr) subcommittee which originated the rider ousting and besmirching the three officials had: 1) examined Mr. Lovett in secret session, for only two hours, on only one day's notice; 2) supplied him with no advance specification of the charges to be brought against him; 3) not permitted him to bring counsel, or to summon witnesses in his behalf; 4) provided neither him, nor the Interior Department, nor the Congress with a transcript...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: U.S. At War: Senate v. House | 6/7/1943 | See Source »

First | Previous | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | Next | Last