Word: destroyer
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Several men have been nominated for both an office and a committee. All who destroy to do so may vote for these men for both positions, and if elected to both, the nominee will accept the office and resign from the committee...
...Saul of Tarsus. Neither of them was that type of man which fills one with despair because it has no ideals and is satisfied with littleness; they both had visions, both heard the call. One obeyed it, the other disobeyed. Saul of Israel heard God's call to destroy Amelek, but disobeyed. Paul the Apostle heard the call to preach to the Gentiles and "was not disobedient to the heavenly vision." One through disobedience sank into absolute faithlessness and the dark shadow of suicide; the other through obedience advanced to a life of glory...
...protective. The Steel Corporation is our greatest trust, but the Wilson tariff against steel and iron was not a particle lower than the Dingley tariff against the same products. Ten years ago, a high duty meant competition and low prices; today it results in the formation of trusts, which destroy competition. In this the Republican party does not approve. It is committed to protection only as a principle and not as a schedule...
...power could not seize territory exceeding in value the amount of the award. Our opponents have argued that to allow seizure of territory would be to abandon the Monroe Doctrine. We of the affirmative believe that wherever the Monroe Doctrine conflicts with justice and right, wherever it operates to destroy legal claims, wherever it prevents carrying out an arbitration award, the doctrine must of necessity yield. Yet in arguing for the temporary suspension of the doctrine under the circumstances of our case we are far from advocating its abandonment. We still retain the right to protect South American States when...
...indifference and idleness among the candidates for this degree that could not for a moment be tolerated in the more advanced departments of the University. Although the facts stated are undeniably true, it is plain that a literal adoption of the suggestions made by the article would tend to destroy that freedom of choice which had been the aim of the College for the last decade at least, and which can be lacked by strong arguments as well as by the testimony of results accomplished...