Search Details

Word: civilizer (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1970
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Attorney General Mitchell "solves" the Civil Rights problem by issuing an executive order to re-enslave all Blacks in the United States...

Author: By John G. Short, | Title: The FutureTea Leaves and Taurus | 1/5/1970 | See Source »

...players assume the role of finance ministers and try to outwit each other at running a national economy. By rolling dice, each participant is tossed from recessions to failing harvests to baby booms. Unless he learns quickly, a novice will find himself strikebound, bankrupt or on the verge of civil war in no time...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Nation: Games Theory | 1/5/1970 | See Source »

...SOUTH AND CIVIL RIGHTS. The President's losing fight on the nomination of South Carolina Judge Clement Haynsworth to the Supreme Court was a clear warning that he cannot expect help from moderate and liberal Republicans on any strategy, "Southern" or otherwise, that might offend their own constituents. The Administration's proposal to weaken voting rights legislation as desired by Southern states stalled after passing the House, but may succeed in the second session. On the other hand, the Administration united with liberals last week to save its "Philadelphia Plan" for expanding construction-job opportunities for Negroes...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Congress: Blurred Lines at Half-Time | 1/5/1970 | See Source »

...that have made Rusk persona non grata among liberals in the North. His target was Rusk's liberalism on the race issue. Rusk, who remembers his own humble origins in Georgia's red-clay Cherokee County, long ago antagonized his segregationist former neighbors by his support for civil rights legislation. He shocked them even more two years ago when he acquiesced to his daughter's marriage to a Negro...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Georgia: Professor Rusk's Problem | 1/5/1970 | See Source »

Refugees. To take back hundreds of thousands of refugees means to invite a civil war in Israel itself, because they would be a fifth column. Even if you gave the refugees the freedom to choose between repatriation and compensation, they would not be free to accept compensation. I am sure the Fatah would see to it that each refugee-even if he did not want to return-would be forced to say that he did want to come back. All of a sudden Israel would be forced into a situation where its internal security would be threatened...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: World: The Israeli View | 1/5/1970 | See Source »

First | Previous | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | Next | Last