Word: case
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1950-1950
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...irresponsibility of the CRIMSON this past term suggests that any defense of your policies on the ground of "A Newspaper's Responsibility" is far removed from any facts in your own case. Specific serious instances of your irresponsibility where I personally know the facts...
...Walter Winchell's unfounded statement that Harvard has a murder on its hands'" was founded on the statements of Assistant State Medical Examiner Dr. Michael A. Luongo that Brickman had probably received a blow on the head and on Luongo's refusal to let the police close the case. The CRIMSON felt and always will feel that such action by a state official is news of interest and significance...
...issue in more than two years. They are about the dealings of the Radcliffe administration with the CRIMSON'S former Radcliffe Bureau chief, Deborah Labenow. One of these letters is from a former CRIMSON editorial chairman, Joel Raphaelson '49; it cuts so cleanly into the issues of the Labenow case that we are printing it as today's editorial...
...former editor of your newspaper I have been particularly interested in the Deborah Labenow case. I have taken part in, observed, listened to, heard about, and, occasionally, unsuccessfully tried to escape from, countless discussions about it. These discussions almost invariably turned on one or both of the following points, which seem to me to have nothing at all to do with the issue, and which tend to obfuscate, confuse, and even to bypass that issue...
Second, such authority remains censorship even if the reporter's conduct is reprehensible beyond question. In the present case, the inaccuracy, unreliability, and lack of ethics of the CRIMSON and Miss Labenow could be ten times what even the worst accusations have claimed, and Radcliffe's actions would still classify as censorship. There are cases when censorship is necessary. Censorship that will protect the safety of the nation's armed forces is clearly such a case. Radcliffe feels that the protection of its own good name against what it claims to be inaccurate reporting is also such a case...