Word: broking
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...didn’t really get going until the Bulgarians hit the dance floor. Kaloyan S. Slavov ’07 led a line of experienced Bulgarians and painfully clueless amateurs to the center of the room. In a form somewhat reminiscent of Riverdance, Slavov and his sweaty troupe broke it down Bulgarian style, snaking through Ticknor Lounge. “I didn’t know how to dance a single Bulgarian dance,” says Slavov of when he first arrived in Cambridge. He explains that he learned his sweet moves at Harvard, and then dropped...
...Tobe said of his counterpart’s standout performance. “Our team worked hard, but their goalie played well.” The Crimson was able to continue applying pressure for much of the third period, but it was the Golden Knights who broke through for the game-winner. Clarkson’s David Cayer sent a pass off the body of teammate Mike Sullivan and past Tobe for the score that eventually spelled the end of Harvard’s stint in the ECAC playoffs. For the Crimson offense, missed opportunities made the loss particularly painful...
...took an early 4-1 lead and remained in control for the rest of the frame. After NJIT pulled ahead to a four-point lead, 20-16, the Highlanders set off on a 10-4 run, seizing a 30-20 victory over the Crimson. “Our passing broke down for a few points and kind of took us out,” Fitz said. “We had to free-bounce the ball over, and we didn’t get quality swings.” Harvard picked up the intensity in the second game, sliding ahead...
...stroke extending the U.S. from the Texas border to the Pacific. At the same moment in London, meanwhile, a 29-year-old German philosopher named Karl Marx and his 27-year-old textile manufacturer friend Friedrich Engels published a pamphlet they called the Communist Manifesto. And days later, revolutions broke out in Europe, first in Paris, which overthrew the French monarchy, and then in several dozen other places on the Continent...
...Crimson gained focus and took the next two games to win the match. In the third game, Harvard’s percentage was a match-high of .419, while MIT hit in the negative with a match-low -.036. The game stayed close at first, but after the Crimson broke the 7-7 tie, the Engineers never caught up, as Harvard triumphed, 30-22.The fourth and final game of the night was yet another close one, but the Crimson remained ahead after gaining 14 points. Effective blocks and kills kept Harvard a few points ahead of MIT. As the Crimson only...