Word: arguments
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1910-1919
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...chooses, take an influential part in the establishment of world peace. The sincerity of America would seem far less real if it increased its military power to first-class standing after the organization of a world league, than if it were to do so now, when the less theoretical argument of the possible necessity of defence is more reasonable, in the eyes of foreign nations, than that of a possible entrance into world politics
...should not be debated now. Harvard's balloting has not settled the question; it is a topic of more than a day's importance, one which will continue to be of acute interest until sober discussion has decided it one way or the other. A triumph achieved without preliminary argument, though it may be indicative, cannot be regarded as final. Both sides may still make converts...
...report made to the CRIMSON yesterday on the result of the competition between the Law School Clubs, the Witanagemot Club of the Law School was given the credit of defeating the Lowell club for the Ames Prize, when the actual result was to the contrary. The Lowell club, whose argument was upheld by A. C. Reis 3L and C. E. Snow 3L, was awarded the decision by the judges of the competition. The case argued was "The Danbury Hatter's Case as affected by the Clayton Act," and the attorneys for the Witanagemot club were L. M. Reiser...
...Witanagemot law club won the Ames Prize by receiving the decision over the Lowell club in the final round of the third-year competition in Langdell Hall last evening. L. M. Reiser 3L and U. E. Wild 3L presented the argument for the winning club which was the defendant in the case argued, while the losing team was composed of A. C. Reis 3L and C. E. Snow 3L. The case presented was, "The Danbury Hatter's Case as affected by the Clayton Act." A large crowd was in attendance to hear the very able arguments offered by both sides...
...Perry's recent essays which is only a degree, less violent than Mr. Wolf's handling of Galsworthy, but from the opposite angle. Professor Perry, we learn, is illogical, prejudiced, engagingly naive, and delicately obscure. The reviewer makes the familiar assertion that large armies cause war, but offers no argument, historical or philosophical, to support it. How he explains the long peace in Europe between 1871 and 1914, whether he thinks Belgium was militaristic and Switzerland unarmed, or whether he similarly holds that umbrellas are the cause of rain, we do not know; but he scorns Professor Perry...