Search Details

Word: argumentatively (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2000
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...argument, Stenberg maintained that the statute applies only to the D&X procedure. However, Dr. Leroy Carhart argues--and a lower court agreed--that the law as written could be interpreted as including the D&E procedure. And, according to Carhart, even in first-trimester procedures "fetal elements" sometimes enter the vagina before the fetus is dead, meaning that zealous prosecutors could use the law against doctors performing virtually any abortion. In fact, the Nebraska legislature passed up opportunities to more narrowly define the law to include only D&X, which abortion-rights have interpreted as an attempt to target...

Author: By Zachary R. Heineman, | Title: Court Must Reaffirm Choice | 5/2/2000 | See Source »

MacKinnon facetiously broke her argument into two sections: "Part One: Why I am Right" and "Part Two: Why Charles is Wrong...

Author: By Matthew F. Quirk, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: HLS Hosts Women's Rights Debate | 5/2/2000 | See Source »

...Their main argument is that you can't regulate beliefs," Biacchi said. "The other argument is, we're giving you money so you have to adopt what we believe is right...

Author: By Erica R. Michelstein, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Tufts Student Group 'Derecognized,' Accused of Discrimination | 5/1/2000 | See Source »

...divorce" his parents in 1992 so that he could stay with the foster parents he loved. Not as many remember that although a Florida appeals court allowed Gregory to remain with his foster parents--it ruled that his natural mother had abandoned him--the same court refused his argument that he had any right to sue his biological parents in the first place...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: What Can a Kid Decide? | 5/1/2000 | See Source »

University of Utah Professor Paul Cassell, presenting the arguments against Miranda, contends that the 1968 federal law supersedes the Supreme Court decision. The 1968 law, a Congressional reaction to outrage over the first Miranda decision, allows "voluntary" confessions to be used in court even if suspects had not been read their Miranda rights. The original ruling, he argues, was a "provisional, interim judgment" to allow Congress to consider other appropriate alternatives. However, even judges who have been critical of Miranda find that argument difficult to accept. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, a conservative who has expressed distaste for the ruling...

Author: By The CRIMSON Staff, | Title: Upholding the Miranda Ruling | 4/28/2000 | See Source »

First | Previous | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last