Search Details

Word: appealable (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2000
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Napster has, in my view, about a 40 percent chance of prevailing on this issue in the appeal currently pending before the 9th Circuit," writes Harvard Professor of Law William W. Fisher in an e-mail message. "Scour believed that it could point to an even more extensive list of legitimate uses of its technology...

Author: By David S. Stolzar, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Scour Play | 11/30/2000 | See Source »

Kessler said this unusual appeal is a crucial aim of the series, which will begin its third season March...

Author: By Julia G. Kiechel, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: "Sopranos" Screenwriter Returns to Harvard | 11/29/2000 | See Source »

...Gore's long-listers for veep, told the Times. The Florida Supreme Court bought Gore some time Nov. 17 when it nixed Katherine Harris's first attempt at certification. The U.S. Supreme Court moved the goal line again on Thanksgiving Friday when it took up Bush's appeal. So when could the next look at a political "forever" come along...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Just How Long Has Gore Got? | 11/29/2000 | See Source »

...Friday, Dec. 1 (?) The Supremes hear arguments on the Bush appeal. A pro-Bush ruling - essentially tossing out all the events between Nov. 14 and Harris's certification Nov. 26 - wouldn't legally deprive Gore of his contest, but the voice of the highest court in the land might cut his political knees out from under him, if it rules promptly. A ruling for Gore would bless his hand counts and buy him another week at least. (Wild card: Rehnquist writes a remedy...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Just How Long Has Gore Got? | 11/29/2000 | See Source »

...butterfly ballot appeal: At last, a bit of closure: According to the Florida high court, the infamous butterfly ballot is legal. While the plaintiffs (i.e., Gore and allies) claimed that the Palm Beach County ballot (which placed candidates' names on both sides of the ballot's punch holes) violates state election law, which requires that all candidates' names be to the left of the holes, the court saw things differently. Friday evening, the Justices upheld a lower court's ruling that the ballots are legal and dismissed the Democrats' case "with prejudice." (In other words, they rejected the appeal...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Presidential Legal Primer | 11/27/2000 | See Source »

First | Previous | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | Next | Last