Search Details

Word: aggressor (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...went on, in his clear, rapid way. The allies must accept the disadvantage of their position, he said. The aggressor could pick...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE NATION: The Man with the Answers | 2/12/1951 | See Source »

...bitter end, India's Sir Benegal Rau deplored the U.S. resolution branding Communist China an aggressor in Korea. It would take the world, he warned the U.N. General Assembly, down the road to disaster. It would mean: "No early ceasefire, every problem in the Far East unsolved, the atmosphere for successful negotiation vitiated, the tensions in the Far East perpetuated...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: UNITED NATIONS: Branded | 2/12/1951 | See Source »

Malik compared two resolutions before the U.N. Assembly's Political Committee. One was the U.S. resolution calling on U.N. to 1) declare Communist China an aggressor, 2) study the possibility of "future collective measures" against Red China, 3) establish a good offices committee that could negotiate with the Chinese Communists when & if they were ready...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: UNITED NATIONS: The Law's Delay | 2/5/1951 | See Source »

Next morning, Poland's Julius Katz-Suchy got the floor, and in his biting, somewhat mangled English he rattled off the old Communist arguments. The charge that Communist China was an aggressor was a "fairy tale." There were only Chinese "volunteers" in Korea. South Africa was next. Its position: firmly with the U.S. Then a man took the floor who should have given the laggards among the delegates some uneasy moments. He was Ato Gachaou Zallaka, a small, neat Ethiopian. In a fast, four-minute speech delivered in French, he simply warned that the "sad experience" of the League...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: UNITED NATIONS: The Law's Delay | 2/5/1951 | See Source »

Grave Dangers. Attlee said that Britain joined in condemning Red China's intervention "in support of an aggressor" in Korea, but "...we do not believe that the time has yet come to consider further measures." When Attlee finished, Churchill warned against the "grave dangers" that would result from "any serious divergencies...between our policy and that of the United States." Churchill was interrupted by Laborite Ellis Smith, who shouted: "We are not going to be trapped into war." Smith and many other Britons fear that "hysterical" or "angry" U.S. diplomacy might land the U.S. (and Britain...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Foreign News: Anxious House | 2/5/1951 | See Source »

First | Previous | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | Next | Last