Search Details

Word: administrationitis (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Princeton defeated Harvard in Sanders Theatre last night in the eight annual debate between the universities for the first time in the series. While excelling in form of presentation, Harvard failed in the end to present a well knit constructive case. In intelligent definition of the real issue, analysis of...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WINS DEBATE. | 3/27/1902 | See Source »

Blair, the second speaker for the affirmative, further developed the affirmative position and said that they stood for the enforcement of the excise law as one of the general body of laws and that Mayor Low's duty of enforcing this law was mandatory, unless he had received by statute...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WINS DEBATE. | 3/27/1902 | See Source »

Grossman, in the second negative speech, contended that the strict enforcement of the excise law and the closing of the saloons brought about violations of the law in a co-ordinate form which are just as illegal and even more pernicious in their nature than those which it is attempted...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WINS DEBATE. | 3/27/1902 | See Source »

After referring briefly to the arguments of the last speaker, Clark closed the constructive case for the negative by defending the policy of judicial enforcement on practical, moral and theoretical grounds. An attempt to enforce this law would be certain to result in the return of Tammany to power at...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WINS DEBATE. | 3/27/1902 | See Source »

The last rebuttal for Harvard was delivered by Clark. He said that while it has been contended that under any system other than strict enforcement there will be a great deal of black-mail, yet there was no black-mail in Brooklyn during Mayor Low's administration, when a discretionary...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PRINCETON WINS DEBATE. | 3/27/1902 | See Source »