Search Details

Word: stewartã (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Perhaps most telling, my dorm mates preferred to watch The Daily Show with Jon Stewart??s commentary on the presidential debates above any news sources. Of course, in a culture that prioritizes snippy phrases over cogent logic, the ultimate broadcaster is Jon Stewart. I completely agree that when Stewart takes news clips and unmercifully ridicules important public figures, it’s very funny. But that’s all that it is, and I’m not sure that my fellow students always realize it. In fact, Jon Stewart was recently on CNN?...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Abadoning Logic for One-Liners | 10/21/2004 | See Source »

...Stewart??s charges have real merit. The media is increasingly becoming a ready mouthpiece for the latest political talking points. This does the public discourse a disservice, lowering the bar for what passes as substantive debate...

Author: By Sasha Post, | Title: Deliberate This | 10/20/2004 | See Source »

...popularity of “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart?? is a good example of our sensitivity to context. Unlike other nighttime political humor on the Leno-Letterman-Conan axis, Stewart relies less on jokes that begin with a nugget of news, followed by a made-up punch line. For the most part, the humor of his “fake” news routine lies in the fact that it’s not fake at all…he allows politicians and journalists to mock themselves. My friends and I often blink in disbelief...

Author: By Peter P.M. Buttigieg, | Title: Running Out of Context | 3/22/2004 | See Source »

...hiding the reason behind her Dec. 27, 2001 sale of shares in the biotech company ImClone Systems. The judge threw out the most serious charge against her—securities fraud, and prosecutors did not have evidence of insider trading and could not bring that charge against her. Stewart??s savings on the ImClone shares, sold the day before an announcement that sent the stock tumbling, was relatively small by corporate scandal standards, amounting to approximately...

Author: By Lia C. Larson, SKIRTING CONVENTION | Title: Martha Stewart's Recipe for Failure | 3/12/2004 | See Source »

...Martha Stewart??s powerful, shrewd character could not be forgiven. Critics called her confidence “arrogance,” her assertiveness “bossiness.” One article called her “a steely-eyed, tart-tongued control-freak executive brought low by hubris.” Another described her as “an uppity, pain-in-the-neck genius.” A letter to the editor in USA Today summed up this attitude perfectly: “It is that smug, arrogant, ‘I’m-above...

Author: By Lia C. Larson, SKIRTING CONVENTION | Title: Martha Stewart's Recipe for Failure | 3/12/2004 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next