Search Details

Word: princeton (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1890-1899
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...committee. A paid treasurer will be appointed who will have charge of all athletic funds and houses. He must be either a graduate or one who has passed two years at college and whose class has been graduated. This system is modelled after the one now in use at Princeton...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Athletics at Columbia. | 12/18/1899 | See Source »

Suzerainty was the basis of the English claims, and the arguments before introduced by Princeton on this point had not been met or refuted...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

...Jones '00, the last speaker for Princeton, said that the negative did not undertake to defend any actions of the present war, but did claim that England's interference was not justifiable. The policy of England in South Africa is tending to tear the races asunder, to destroy all relations that ever existed between England and the Boers. Furthermore, the few instances cited by the affirmative show no more proof of a state of mob law in the Transvaal than our 127 lynchings last year prove that the United States is in a state of riot...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Hill, who spoke first in rebuttal for Princeton, asked the affirmative to reconcile the peaceful effect of the Owen's claims with the conditions existing at the present day. England not only laid claims to suzerainty, but took action in accordance with these claims, when she refused to accept arbitration, alleging that she had suzerainty. The Boers acceded to England's demands on Aug. 19-21, on condition that England merely kept her promises, made in the convention of 1884. The Boers would have acceded to the English claims, which the affirmative maintain, would have brought peace and prosperity...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

...stood untouched by the negative. International law gave England the right to interfere for the protection of her subjects and even of the natives--a right promised by the Boers in the negotiations regarding the conventions. But conventions aside, England had the general right to protect her citizens, and Princeton did not deny this. The South African troubles had to be faced by England, but, in facing them, she did not demand government control. Wherever English subjects were maltreated, there harmony could never exist

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next