Word: boardã
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Unwrapping these apparent contradictions can be challenging for both board members and outsiders. Criticisms of the Ad Board??s handling of sexual assault cases run the gamut: for example, many would like to see more sexual assault cases end more frequently with decisive rulings, others complain that the board deprives the accused of due process...
While using fact finders has solved some of the issues with the Ad board??s sexual assault policies, many believe there are still fundamental flaws in the adjudication process that need to be addressed...
During their review of the Ad Board??s procedures, the Leaning Committee found that many students involved in the process felt that the board “was not doing a sufficiently comprehensive or timely job” in dealing with cases of sexual assault, according to Jennifer Leaning, a human rights professor and chair of the committee...
Prior to the inclusion of fact-finders in the process, members of the Ad Board??comprised of administrators and faculty members—were responsible for interviewing witnesses, collecting statements, and collating evidence, according to John “Jay” L. Ellison, associate dean of the College and the secretary of the Ad Board...
Over the past two decades, criticism of the Ad Board??s handling of sexual assault cases has been divided into two camps: one believes that the Ad Board and the Faculty rules set an unreasonably high bar for finding a student guilty of rape, while the other believes that the board does not treat accused students fairly...